Scientific research validates that fanatic adherence to SCD is needed in
order to starve out the
bacteria :
A high percentage of people with digestive problems have biofilms inside
their bodies[1]. Many DAN doctors are discovering that this also applies
to children
with autism.
A biofilm is a colony of microorganisms that develop brilliant survival
strategies.
The bacteria that live in biofilm can exist with very little
food. The biofilm enables them to starve for a long time.[2]
They are extremely efficient with any food supply. Nothing
is wasted. Different types of microorganisms share the same food
meaning one bacteria's waste may be used by another kind of bacteria
that utilizes the discarded food. [3]
Bacteria have the ability to live in biofilm on minute amounts of food
making them very resistant to antibiotics[4]. Biofilms emit chemical
weapons against the very body where they reside.[5]
Gram negative bacteria residing within biofilms have the
ability to live with severe limitations of food because they developed
a special biochemical process.[6] These gram negative bacteria
are abundant in the bodies of people with IBD and also those with
autism. The gram negative bacteria contain a poison called "endotoxin" or LPS.
LPS is capable of inducing a variety of severe reactions and conditions
including IBD[7] and aberrant brain development[8]. LPS is very destructive because it
provokes the body to produce an immunological response.
The requirement for strictness is because we are fighting
extremely hardy microorganisms. One crumb of the wrong food feeds millions of
harmful bacteria for a month, and continues
the cycle of destruction. Larger quantities of undigested food can
provide enough nutrients to feed a huge army of bacteria and allow a
biofilm to continue residing in the body where it continues to
proliferate poisoning.
Click here to view another very important reason for strict adherence
References
[1] Bacteria from biofilm were found in 90 to 95% of IBD patients, 95% of patients with self-limiting colitis, 65% of IBS patients, and 35% of healthy controls.
The author of this study uses the term "mucosal bacteria" to describe bacteria from biofilm.
He explains his terminology at the third paragraph after the INTRODUCTION of his
article:
"The term biofilm has been used to describe a structured community of bacterial cells enclosed in a self-produced polymeric matrix and adherent to an inert or living surface. The mucosal bacteria found in patients with IBD can thus be regarded as intestinal biofilms."
Explanation of "mucosal bacteria".
The abstract of this article on PubMed
"Mucosal bacteria were found at concentrations greater than 109/ml in 90 to 95% of IBD patients, 95% of patients with self-limiting colitis, 65% of IBS patients, and 35% of healthy controls."
[2]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9172348?dopt=Abstract
Bacteria in biofilms were able to survive despite starvation for 43
days!
[3]
The book, The Biofilm Primer,
by J. W. Costerton describes how bacteria in biofilm work cooperatively to share the food supply and avoid wasting any source of food. Click on page 72 to read more about this topic. View the book
[4]The following three scientific articles discuss how bacteria have the ability to live in biofilm on minute amounts of food and how this is
making them very resistant to antibiotics.
http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/64/4/1526?ijkey=fcee9fc41513fdb0e0a2bb6287dab046a6bc0aa2#Introduction
"Biofilms are known for their recalcitrance to antimicrobial agents. One
of the mechanisms proposed to explain the enhanced resistance of
microbial cells within biofilms is the existence of physiological
differences between biofilm and planktonic cells (1). One physiological
difference, starvation, is thought to play an important role in
resistance to antimicrobial treatment."
http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/15/2/167#Altered Growth Rate of Biofilm Organisms
"Another proposed mechanism for biofilm resistance to antimicrobial
agents is that biofilm-associated cells grow significantly more slowly
than planktonic cells and, as a result, take up antimicrobial agents
more slowly."
http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/full/47/4/1251?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=lactamase&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=220&resourcetype=HWFIG#BDY
Our hypothesis was that some of the bacteria in these biofilms
experience nutrient limitation and enter a stationary-phase state. It
was further hypothesized that bacteria that had entered stationary phase
would be protected from killing by antibiotics as long as they lacked
key nutrients.
[5]
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080723094848.htm
Biofilms emit chemical weapons against
our body?
[6]
http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/15/2/167#Other%20Physiological%20Changes%20Due%20to%20Biofilm%20Mode%20of%20Growth
"Gram-negative bacteria respond to nutrient limitation and other environmental stresses by synthesizing sigma factors."
[7] LPS is
capable of inducing IBD
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3961278?dopt=AbstractPlus
[8] LPS is
capable of inducing aberrant brain development
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17211134?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum